Collaboration & communication combined. (Whether or not infinite chatty one-line messages are preferable to an overflowing inbox is debatable; for now, although, Slack retains the benefit of novelty.) It integrates the instruments you already use, like Google Drive, so you’ll be able to simply centralize every part.
Whereas your colleagues chat within the well-appointed break room of Slack’s public channels, you may always peel off with a selected few and begin whispering about what’s actually going on. Slack might present itself as a beacon of transparency — a vibrant, door-free workplace with a bot taking lunch orders — but it surely’s additionally the publish-meeting smoke break, providing easy access to the conspiratorial intimacy on which co-worker friendship thrives (especially coveted within the open-plan realm, the place privateness will be onerous to return by).
You pivot from a group dialog to a back-channel rehash of the conversation — it is a move that makes you feel barely craven (why cannot you stop yourself?) and also, because it may so simply go awry (and because you know this!), form of dumb.
On the agenda is the question that’s been most on Butterfield’s mind lately: how his $2.8 billion startup, which makes business-collaboration software, could be pretty much as good with 250, 500, or a thousand individuals as it was when he based it with a crew of eight.
Slack is the exemplar of a pattern analysts have dubbed the consumerization of enterprise technology It is the idea that the ubiquity of smartphones and the popularity of apps reminiscent of Facebook, Instagram, and Sweet Crush have modified our collective expectations of how software should look and function, creating huge alternatives for enterprise purposes as intuitive and person-pleasant as those people use for fun.